2019 Toyota RAV4 on the road Image

2019 Toyota RAV4 Engine Problems: Owners Raise Concerns in Recent NHTSA Complaints

Lemon Law, Toyota , ,

Recent NHTSA complaints have shed light on engine problems faced by owners of 2019 Toyota RAV4 vehicles. These issues have prompted concerns over safety, reliability, and significant repair costs. This article delves into the details of these complaints, their impact, and the steps you can take if you’re experiencing similar challenges.

NHTSA Complaints and Average Mileage

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) gathers data on vehicle safety, including complaints from owners. For 2019 Toyota RAV4 models, the reported engine problems have been given an average severity rating of 7.6 out of 10, indicating a concerning level of severity. These complaints have been logged at an average mileage of 6,304 miles.

Diverse Complaint Categories

The NHTSA complaints are spread across various categories, making it challenging to easily identify and comprehend the specific issues. This lack of organization complicates understanding the scope and nature of the problems reported.

Coolant Bypass Valve Failure and Overheating Risks

Several owners have reported a recurring problem related to the coolant bypass valve. This failure has the potential to cause engine overheating or even complete seizure.

The symptoms include a persistent “Engine Maintenance Required” message displayed on the dashboard, which cannot be cleared away.

Widespread Issue and Lack of Recall

Numerous owners have expressed frustration over the recurring coolant bypass valve issue. This defect, which can result in significant overheating risks, has been acknowledged by Toyota representatives as a known problem for model year 2019.

Despite the prevalence of this issue and the high number of repairs, Toyota has not issued a recall or Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) to address it.

Repair Costs and Owner Discontent

Owners have shared their experiences of facing repair bills ranging from $500 to $1000 due to the coolant bypass valve failure. The costs are particularly burdensome given that many of these vehicles are relatively new.

Despite the widespread nature of the problem and the associated safety concerns, owners have expressed discontent over the lack of action taken by Toyota.

Legal Implications and Seeking Compensation

If you’re an owner of a 2019 Toyota RAV4 and you’ve encountered coolant bypass valve problems or other engine-related issues, it’s crucial to understand your rights.

You may be entitled to compensation for repair costs, potential safety risks, and inconvenience caused by these problems.

 

For a free consultation and legal advice tailored to your situation, contact the expert attorneys at Law Office of Howard Gutman today. Our team is dedicated to helping you understand your options and pursuing the compensation you deserve. Call (973) 598-1980 now.

 

Conclusion

The recent NHTSA complaints regarding engine problems in 2019 Toyota RAV4 vehicles raise important concerns about safety, reliability, and the responsibilities of vehicle manufacturers.

If you’re experiencing similar issues, seeking legal guidance can provide you with a path to understanding your rights and taking appropriate action. Don’t hesitate to reach out to Law Office of Howard Gutman for a free consultation to discuss your situation and explore potential avenues for compensation.

 

Source:

 

You may also like:

FCC’s Record Penalty Against Auto Warranty Robocall Scammers: Protecting Consumers from Deceptive Calls

 

Toyota Sienna Hybrid on the road

Toyota Sienna Hybrid Cable Corrosion Sparks Lawsuit: What You Need to Know

Lemon Law, Toyota , , , ,

A recent class action lawsuit has highlighted a concerning issue affecting Toyota Sienna hybrid minivans manufactured between 2021 and 2023.

The lawsuit alleges that these vehicles, known for their hybrid powertrains and all-wheel-drive capability, are plagued by defective cables that connect the front of the vehicle to the rear motor generators. This corrosion issue has led to a series of challenges, prompting owners to take legal action.

The Class Action Lawsuit

The lawsuit encompasses a range of 2021-2023 Toyota Sienna minivans, including LE, XLE, Limited, XSE, and Platinum models.

The central point of contention revolves around the hybrid system power cable, which features an orange connector linking it to the rear motor generator. According to the lawsuit, this cable and connector are susceptible to corrosion, primarily caused by exposure to snow, road salt, and other debris encountered on the road.

Previous Cases and Plaintiffs

The plaintiffs initiating this class action lawsuit have drawn parallels to earlier legal actions against Toyota. Notably, they reference the Isenberg v Toyota and Constantin Sultana v Toyota Canada class actions, which also dealt with cable corrosion issues in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.

The current lawsuit was filed by two owners:

  • Mark Chatwin from New York, who owns a 2023 Toyota Sienna XSE/AWD, and
  • Gioi (Joey) Nguyen from Texas, who purchased a 2023 Toyota Sienna SXE 25th Anniversary Edition AWD.

Corrosion Impact and Concealed Damage

The corrosion problem affecting the Sienna hybrid cable connector can lead to serious repercussions. While initial symptoms may include noise or distortion in the radio, the real concern emerges when the hybrid system itself fails, necessitating a replacement of the cable.

Interestingly, this problem might not become apparent for several years, as corrosion gradually worsens over time.

Warranty and Misrepresentation

One of the most contentious points in the lawsuit revolves around warranty coverage. The plaintiffs argue that Toyota initially asserted that the cable was only covered by the basic warranty, which lasts for 3 years or 36,000 miles. This contradicted the Hybrid Component Warranty, which spans 8 years or 100,000 miles, and the HV battery warranty covering 10 years or 150,000 miles.

The lawsuit contends that Toyota’s initial representation misled customers about the extent of coverage for hybrid-related components.

Repair Costs and Neglect

As the cable corrosion issue typically manifests after the basic warranty has expired, affected Sienna owners face substantial repair costs. Replacing the cable can result in bills ranging from $4,200 to $8,000.

What’s more troubling is that the owner’s manuals and warranty booklets reportedly lack any directive to inspect or maintain hybrid cables, harnesses, or connectors.

Allegations Against Toyota

The lawsuit further claims that Toyota was aware of the cable corrosion issue before selling the affected Sienna hybrid minivans. This awareness, the plaintiffs argue, is especially significant given that similar issues had been observed in other Toyota hybrid models.

The plaintiffs are seeking justice for affected owners and holding Toyota accountable for the alleged defects.

Conclusion

This class action lawsuit, titled Chatwin, et al., v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. If you’re facing similar challenges with your Sienna hybrid’s cables, contacting legal experts could be a step toward addressing these issues and seeking potential compensation.

 

If you own, lease, or have owned/leased an impacted Toyota Sienna hybrid minivan in New Jersey, contact our legal experts at Law Office of Howard Gutman for a free consultation.

Our experienced attorneys are here to help you understand your rights and potential compensation. Call (973) 598-1980 now.

 

Source:

 

You may also like:

Toyota Sienna Sliding Doors Class Action

Hyundai Ioniq 5 on the Street

Hyundai Level 2 Charger Problems Spark Class Action Lawsuit: Allegations of Charging Failures and Overheating

Hyundai Kia, Lemon Law , , , ,

A class action lawsuit has been initiated against Hyundai, encompassing a range of electric vehicles including the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, and Genesis GV60. The lawsuit centers on alleged issues with the vehicles’ level 2 chargers, which have reportedly led to charging failures and overheating concerns.

Owners’ Claims of Charging Challenges

The lawsuit was filed by three owners who assert that their experiences with the level 2 chargers were far from satisfactory.

These vehicles are advertised to offer specific charging times when using a level 2 charger at home. However, it’s alleged that defects within the chargers cause them to overheat before completing the charging process.

Overheating Issues and Unfulfilled Charging Promises

According to the plaintiffs, the chargers can overheat within a short span of 30 to 60 minutes of usage. As a consequence, Hyundai owners are reportedly required to disconnect and reconnect their home chargers to restart the charging process.

The lawsuit claims that customers who plug in their vehicles overnight discover in the morning that their electric vehicles are not fully charged. Moreover, overheated chargers are said to frequently result in damage to vehicle components.

Charging Time Discrepancies

The electric vehicles are purportedly designed to be charged using 240-volt level 2 chargers at 48 amps within about seven hours. Interestingly, the Kia EV6 model pledges a charging time of five hours and 50 minutes using a level 2 charger at home.

However, the lawsuit argues that offered software repairs by Hyundai and Kia do not effectively address the charger issues. Allegedly, the software updates lower the level 2 charging speeds to prevent overheating, significantly prolonging the charging times to more than 10 hours.

Software Modifications and Charging Port Design

The class action lawsuit asserts that the software repairs implemented by dealerships fail to deliver solutions. In fact, the lawsuit contends that the technical service bulletin (TSB) 23-EV-003h, which addresses charging problems, does not disclose that the software update doubles the charging time.

The plaintiffs point out that customers must manually reduce the charging current to prevent failures, but even this approach does not prevent charge failures, especially when charging at a lower 28 amps.

Design Defect Allegations

The heart of the problem, as per the plaintiffs, lies in a design defect within the charging port. This alleged defect is believed to trigger overheating. When the port reaches a certain temperature, the vehicle’s safety mechanisms reportedly halt the charging session, yet fail to automatically resume the session when the port’s temperature becomes acceptable again.

Moreover, the lawsuit claims that charging failures occur more frequently during higher outside temperatures.

Class Action Lawsuit Filed

The lawsuit, titled David Gould, et al., v. Hyundai Motor Company, et al., was filed by three Hyundai Ioniq 5 owners: David Gould from New York, Kaushik Iyengar from Georgia, and John Nixon from Florida.

The lawsuit is currently under consideration in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

 

If you are an owner of a Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, or Genesis GV60 and have faced similar problems related to level 2 chargers, you might have the opportunity to initiate a new lawsuit to seek compensation.

Our proficient attorneys of Law Office of Howard Gutman are here to provide you with a complimentary consultation to discuss your situation and offer expert legal guidance.

Don’t hesitate to get in touch by dialing (973) 598-1980, or you can also complete our online form to take the first step towards resolving your concerns.

 

Source:

 

You may also like:

Most Lemon Cars of 2022: Cars with Most Claimed Problems

Mazda CX-5 with Engine Troubles

2019 Mazda CX-5 Owners’ Nightmares: Engine Problems and Unexplained Acceleration – Consult Our Lemon Law Attorneys Now!

Lemon Law, Mazda, Quote , ,

Discover the unsettling engine problems that have plagued 2019 Mazda CX-5 owners, alongside concerning reports of unexplained acceleration.

In this article, we delve into real-life complaints from consumers, highlighting the urgency of addressing these issues. If you are facing similar problems, don’t hesitate to consult our lemon law attorneys for a free case evaluation today.

 

Troubling Engine Complaint from Edmunds Review

One owner reported a nightmarish experience with their 2019 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring. They said,

“We own the 2019 CX-5 Grand Touring. Took vehicle in for exhaust odor when stopped. The vehicle with only 20k miles was at the dealer for 7 weeks for a cylinder head leak and parts were not available. After removing the engine, they determined lifters were needed as well. Again only 20k miles.”

 

Alarming NHTSA Complaints about Engine Issues

The NHTSA received several alarming complaints related to engine problems in the 2019 Mazda CX-5. One owner from Stamford, CT (NHTSA ID Number: 11536164) stated,

“Purchase a new 2019 CX5 at Riley Mazda Stamford. After 3 years and with 88k miles, the head gasket cylinder gasket needs a replacement for $4500. While searching, I read the same complaints from 2019 CX5 owners about head gasket blownout.”

Another complaint from Grand Rapids, MI (NHTSA ID Number: 11534670) reported,

“Crack in Cylinder Head at only 67,000 miles, leaking fuel into exhaust system, causing smoke while driving.”

 

Disturbing Owner Comments on Carcomplaints.com

On Carcomplaints.com, multiple Mazda CX-5 owners expressed their frustrations with engine problems. One owner (Charles M. from Fort Worth, US) shared their experiences, saying,

“The auto was halting in traffic, lights flashing, Malfunction lights illuminated, car shaking and losing power, noise from wheels.”

Another owner (Gail B. from North Haledon, US) mentioned,

“Trying to get Mazda to approve retrieving the EDR data. Insurance company stated that they would pay for the test. It has been a month and Mazda will not approve this test.”

 

Consult Our Lemon Law Attorneys for a Free Case Evaluation

If your 2019 Mazda CX-5 is facing engine problems or unexplained acceleration, it’s crucial to protect your rights as a consumer. Consult our experienced lemon law attorneys for a free case evaluation. Don’t let these issues persist; take action now to ensure Mazda addresses the problems with your vehicle promptly and effectively.

 

Don’t wait for your engine problems to escalate! Consult our lemon law attorneys today for a free case evaluation. Call at (973) 598-1980 for free consultation. We’re here to protect your rights and secure the resolution you deserve!

 

Sources:

  • 2019 Mazda CX-5 – Consumer review | Edmunds
  • 2019 Mazda CX-5 – Complaints | NHTSA
  • 2019 Mazda CX-5 – Owner comments | com

 

You may also like:

FCC’s Record Penalty Against Auto Warranty Robocall Scammers: Protecting Consumers from Deceptive Calls

FCC’s Record Penalty Against Auto Warranty Robocall Scammers: Protecting Consumers from Deceptive Calls

Do Not Call List , ,

If you’ve ever been bombarded with robocalls offering fake car warranties and extended coverage, you’re not alone. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently imposed a historic $300 million fine on an international network of companies responsible for a vast auto warranty scam.

Making over five billion illegal robocalls to more than 500 million phone numbers in just three months, these scammers violated federal statutes, FCC regulations, and spoofing laws. They employed deceptive tactics, using fake caller IDs to mislead consumers and trick them into answering. This article dives into the details of the violation and offers actionable advice to protect yourself from such deceptive calls.

 

The Unprecedented FCC Penalty for Auto Warranty Scammers

The FCC’s enforcement action against the auto warranty robocall scheme resulted in a record-breaking $300 million fine. This international network of companies executed a complex scheme to make over five billion illegal robocalls within a three-month period in 2021. Their violations included making pre-recorded voice calls without consent, calling numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, and failing to provide an opt-out call-back number.

Moreover, they employed deceptive spoofing tactics using more than a million different caller IDs to hide their true identities and deceive victims.

 

The Deceptive Car Warranty Scam and Violations

Operating under various company names like Sumco Panama, Virtual Telecom, and more, this network of scammers peddled vehicle service contracts under the guise of selling auto warranties. Despite bans against making telemarketing calls, central players Roy M. Cox and Aaron Michael Jones continued their deceptive practices.

Their illegal robocalls promised car owners extended warranties and interest rate reduction programs, among other false claims. The FCC’s investigation found these calls to be part of a larger scheme to gain access to personal and financial information.

 

FCC’s Efforts to Stop the Robocall Menace

To combat the flood of illegal car warranty robocalls, the FCC took decisive action. They directed U.S.-based voice service providers to stop carrying traffic associated with specific members of the network, leading to a 99% reduction in these scam calls.

The FCC collaborated with the Ohio Attorney General’s Office, which filed a lawsuit against individuals involved in the operation under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The FCC’s successful partnership with state authorities aims to protect American consumers from fraudulent robocall campaigns.

 

Taking a Stand: Confronting Car Warranty Scammers

Amidst the barrage of car warranty robocalls, one person decided to take action. They recorded their interactions with the scammers and posted a video titled “Messing with the Car Warranty Scammers – 2021Compilation” on YouTube. The video garnered 3.7K views, exposing the extent of the issue.

The individual challenged the scammers’ deceptive tactics, highlighting that the calls were selling fake warranty coverage. Despite not qualifying for the scam, they confronted the callers, turning the tables on the relentless robocalls and inspiring others to stand up against such scams.

 

 

Protecting Yourself from Deceptive Robocalls

While the FCC’s enforcement actions are crucial, it’s essential to take steps to protect yourself from deceptive robocalls.

  1. Be cautious when receiving unsolicited calls, especially if they promise deals that seem too good to be true.
  2. Hang up if you suspect a robocall, and never share personal or financial information over the phone unless you’re sure about the caller’s identity.
  3. Register your phone numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry to reduce unwanted telemarketing calls.
  4. Report any suspicious robocalls to the FCC and your state’s Attorney General’s Office.

 

Seeking Justice and Putting an End to Robocall Scams

The FCC’s record-breaking fine sends a strong message to scammers involved in illegal robocall operations. However, stopping these deceptive calls entirely requires collective action from consumers, law enforcement agencies, and legal professionals.

If you’ve been affected by auto warranty robocall scams or any other deceptive telemarketing practices, our law firm is here to help.

 

Contact us today at (973) 598-1980 for a free consultation, and together, we can seek justice, put an end to robocall scams, and protect consumers from falling victim to these pernicious schemes. Let’s take a stand against fraudulent robocalls and safeguard the integrity of U.S. communications networks.

 

Sources:

  • FCC Slams Record Penalty on Transnational Auto Warranty Robocalling Operation | TheDoNotCallList
  • FCC Imposes Record Fine on Transnational Illegal Robocalling Operation | FCC
  • FCC Fines Illegal Robocalling Company Record $300 MILLION After Making More Than Five Billion Calls To More Than 500 Million Phone Numbers In Three Months | NYbreaking

 

You may also like:

Car Warranty Calls & the Do Not Call List

1 2
MENU